posted May 10, 2001 04:34 AM            

70GTO, m'boy, what exactly IS a "thought-inhibited post"? Well, your last one gave me a clue.

"Inhibited" is synonymous with "prevented" or "restrained". Let me get this straight: you'll post a reply if someone "posts a thought inhibited statement"? That can't be right. What you probably meant was THOUGHT-INHABITED statement. A thought-inhabited post might in fact contain some pre-meditated thought. A THOUGHT-INHIBITED post would be the opposite.

Well, whatever. Inhibited is a negative term, but oddly enough, BAdAzZ and jaminslu actually gave you some help and made up for your painful oversight by using the much more appropriate terms "inspired" and "induced".

Right now, they're scoring far higher on the IQ spectrum.

Quite frankly, 70GTO, your explication of "inspired" was woefully incoherent. Let me try: the etymology of INSPIRED is the Latin phrase IN SPIRITUS, which would roughly translate "containing spirit". Whether this means in a religious or mystical sense isn't too relevant. The term's a bit more versatile in English.

But, I'd be interested in hearing your fascinating explanation of "induced". As well, throw in a constrasting definition of "deduced", because I always had trouble with that in Logic & Rhetoric 202.

And I WOULD appreciate if you really did use the dictionary to which P!R@N@ alludes. And not one of those lowball student ones either, thanks.

posted May 10, 2001 03:29 PM               

quote:

---

Originally posted by P!R@N@:
he reads the dictionary too much, and that is all he reads.

Lets also make sure that this doesnt turn into the kinda boards you were talking about such as the one where all they talked about was the other guys having small dicks and insulting other guys. I like fantasycars and i want it to stay that way.

Now a simple statement that required no thought for me that will confuse him:
The Bugatti Veyron is awesome, no better car on earth.

---

back on my own statement, had i actually payed real attention to his "inhibited" i would have realized he never reads the dictionary and probably failed L/A, let alone any other class he has ever taken.

And I guess no better car on earth may be alittle exagerated wiht the carrera gt coming up but that is alright.

posted May 10, 2001 11:48 PM               

------------------
My Car Dealership: http://www.geocities.com/blackta00

'93 Camaro Z28 A4: Custom CAI, TB Bypass
FS: $8,000

'92 VW Corrado VR6: EIP Intake Manifold, Neuspeed P-chip, Neuspeed Intake, Eibach Springs, 17" Konig Monsoons, Custom Exhaust, Stage III Clutch
FS: $10,000

posted May 12, 2001 09:43 PM               

------------------
There´s no substitute for efficiently engineered cubic inches(or centimeters)
check my new site
http://frictionx.50megs.com/default.htm

posted May 13, 2001 05:47 PM               

A toast to kingfisher?

posted May 14, 2001 09:56 AM            

70GTO, m'boy, what exactly IS a "thought-inhibited post"? "Inhibited" is synonymous with "prevented" or "restrained".
----------

Very Good fisherman! Just let me say that that is a very good job for such a "smart" guy like yourself.

------
Kingfisher says:

Let me get this straight: you'll post a reply if someone "posts a thought inhibited statement"?
--------

Once again you are correct! Good job! Thought inhibited for the last time, for all you geniuses that didn't understand it the first two times. The "post" being the object would be restrained or "inhibited" to having a content based on thought. Is that clear enough for you?
------

Kingfisher says:
That can't be right. What you probably meant was THOUGHT-INHABITED statement. A thought-inhabited post might in fact contain some pre-meditated thought. A THOUGHT-INHIBITED post would be the opposite.

-------

No, Tommy the tuna. I was right. I didn't mean to say inhabited. By the way don't hyphenate two words together when they don't need to be. And next time you try to talk to me don't waste my time with an incorrect definition and a whole crapload of dumbass.

On a much nicer note, I am only going to talk about cars from now on. I want to apologize for dragging this on so long.
I did start out talking about cars. All I sais was that his Tiburon was fugly. Then he got all upset and requested that I say very mean things to him. In turn, I honored his request and gave him a beat down with my brain.

Your friend and personal Savior,
70GTOjudge

posted May 14, 2001 02:06 PM               

You said:

"None of you are taking me seriously, yet I am all that any of you have talked about for the last two pages worth of discussion. I love the way I can just fuck up your day, oh I'm sorry, I meant to say fuck up a whole shit load of your days.

.....

Why don't you all say goodbye to someone with a huge fuckin brain(myself), because I am tired of talking to a bunch of fuckin idiots."

But why then, are you still present, so willing to enlighten us in righteous ways from which we have so obviously strayed? You contradict yourself my semi-intellectual friend.

Do you really believe you are fucking up anyone's day? That is genuinely pathetic. None of the residents here will care so much for a messageboard that the sudden appearance of a moronic individual as yourself will be shocking or disturbing. Don't flatter yourself . You are merely displaying your obvious ignorance in thinking that we all care as much about online shouting as you do. Some folks have real lives.

Finally, pal, this is a messageboard to discuss cars. Why are you here? To show the average car enthousiast how clever you are supposed to be? I discuss on forums which deal with much more difficult matters than the love for cars, (as beautiful as they can be) and I am not at all impressed by what you have shown. A few words out of an OED in an incorrect context only show you for the ...... (fill in your favorite satanic minion here) that you are.

Whatever reply you will give, it will not merit one from me. Depart from these boards or make the effort to be productive in a matter corresponding the nature of this board.

posted May 14, 2001 07:02 PM               

Anyways, lets hope he keeps his word about car posts only and doesnt ever use his pea sized brain to try and argue again.

posted May 15, 2001 10:15 AM               

------------------
My Car Dealership: http://www.geocities.com/blackta00

'93 Camaro Z28 A4: Custom CAI, TB Bypass
FS: $8,000

'92 VW Corrado VR6: EIP Intake Manifold, Neuspeed P-chip, Neuspeed Intake, Eibach Springs, 17" Konig Monsoons, Custom Exhaust, Stage III Clutch
FS: $10,000

posted May 16, 2001 01:10 PM               

quote:

---

Originally posted by s2k:
FUGLY!

---

Witht the W is it like 2 small v8s put together based on waht GTO said, w16 is abou7t the size of a v10

posted May 16, 2001 11:02 PM               

quote:

---

Originally posted by Adam:
1001 bhp in britain's measurement, but in US it's just 987

---

Anywhere near 1000 is incredible though. Well in a street legal car, anyway.

------------------
My Car Dealership: http://www.geocities.com/blackta00

'93 Camaro Z28 A4: Custom CAI, TB Bypass
FS: $8,000

'92 VW Corrado VR6: EIP Intake Manifold, Neuspeed P-chip, Neuspeed Intake, Eibach Springs, 17" Konig Monsoons, Custom Exhaust, Stage III Clutch
FS: $10,000