|
Author
|
Topic: The All-New Lamborghini Murcielago is Here!
|
48Valve
Member Posts: 109
From:
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted September 15, 2001 07:15 AM
   
But we'll have to see what murcielago's future SV or GT models say about the upcoming F60.
2001 Murcielago
2002 Murcielago Roadster?
2003 Murcielago SV/GT?
(Oh dear, here we go again...  ) quote:
Originally posted by Ferrari4ever:
It looks cool the new lambo,but there's no way it can touch the almighty Ferrari!  .
Ferrari rules!!!!!.
------------------
IP: Logged |
Bernardi
Junior Member Posts: 1
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted September 16, 2001 10:29 AM
Frankly, I expected something more... extravagant, if that's possible. The Countach and Diablo looked far different to anything else on the road when they came out. I think the Cala by Italdesign might have been a better choice. All in all, it's a typically excellent car by Lamborghini.I will send in my version next time. IP: Logged |
CultMaster
Moderator Posts: 529
From: Manchester UK
Registered: Jul 2001
|
posted September 17, 2001 11:45 AM
Dunno bout you but I've never seen a car like the Murcie before! I think if you saw it in the flesh/metal, you'd maybe think differently.------------------
 IP: Logged |
kingfisher
Member Posts: 2532
From: Canada
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted September 18, 2001 06:15 PM
I think Lamborghini already announced an open-topped version of the Murcielago will follow shortly.------------------
IP: Logged |
Ollieferrari
Junior Member Posts: 2
From:
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted September 18, 2001 09:33 PM
It's horrible. I can't even tell the styling is Italian. It looks like a 300zx with body kit. Lamborghini will never compared to Ferrari....Nice try.------------------
IP: Logged |
kramermic
Member Posts: 500
From: St. Pete, FL
Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted September 19, 2001 10:28 AM
you can say that again!!!!!!!!!!!!!------------------
Does it get any better than this? 0-60 in 3.6 top speed 205mph, and built in 1989.
Dubs with ice, no love for rice!
Euro 'til I die. Word to your mutha IP: Logged |
Calibandar
Member Posts: 345
From: Netherlands
Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted September 19, 2001 12:44 PM
I have to say that "a 300 ZX with a body kit" is a pretty accurate description!------------------
 IP: Logged |
deoverian
Junior Member Posts: 7
From: Paris, France
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted September 24, 2001 09:01 AM
The impression of deja vu is obvious (except for cultmaster ) that's why people are disappointed... This car seems to be a mix of a lot of what we already seen. Ten years Lambo didn't conceive a new car, they should have surprised us with innovative design. They didn't.------------------
IP: Logged |
philbob2k
Junior Member Posts: 1
From: Blackburn,Lancashire,England
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted September 25, 2001 06:52 AM
This is the car to bring Lambo into the 21st century, with a big bang------------------
IP: Logged |
macounfan
Junior Member Posts: 2
From:
Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted September 25, 2001 02:49 PM
That is the biggest mistake of a car ive seen since the new beetle and PT cruiser. Id take a ferrari over the new diablo any day. Id even take a 2003 viper, for a cool 150 g's less. ------------------
IP: Logged |
CultMaster
Moderator Posts: 529
From: Manchester UK
Registered: Jul 2001
|
posted September 25, 2001 03:10 PM
le quote:
Originally posted by macounfan:
That is the biggest mistake of a car ive seen since the new beetle and PT cruiser. Id take a ferrari over the new diablo any day. Id even take a 2003 viper, for a cool 150 g's less.
I think you just made the biggest mistake you'll ever make. This car is a work of art, and the Chrysler PT Cruiser is a stunning piece of retro genius. 
------------------
 IP: Logged |
48Valve
Member Posts: 109
From:
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted September 27, 2001 12:27 AM
I'll stick with Murcielago and Lambo 'till death...
IMO New Beetle is cute, like Lupo, while PT Cruiser is different, but needs desperately more power.------------------
IP: Logged |
kramermic
Member Posts: 500
From: St. Pete, FL
Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted September 27, 2001 05:14 PM
The PT cruiser wouldn't be so bad if they gave it some real power. To bad it's just a neon station wagon IMO. It has the same basic frame, just the wagon like body. It's right up there with the new Beetle if you ask me. ------------------
Attention all American and Rice drivers, Suck this!
RENNtech CLK GTX
0-60:3.4 Top speed:220mph
How would you like to get smoked by this guy in you Vette or Viper while he is on his way to pick up the kids.
Dubs with ice, no love for rice!
Euro 'til I die. IP: Logged |
FerrariKid14
Moderator Posts: 2755
From: Granville, OH
Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted September 28, 2001 05:38 AM
The PT Cruiser is a powerless minivan with a nice body kit. All it has to its advantage are looks. And they're SO common...everybody, regardless of age, wants "one of those cool Cruiser things". The convertible, when produced, should be an even bigger success.------------------
 IP: Logged |
LamboKid86
Junior Member Posts: 3
From: USA
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted September 28, 2001 02:25 PM
I think the car kicks *** and hopefully if it lives up to the hype it'll blow away any POS Ferrari that has been or ever will be produced, and maybe even bring home the award of fastest production car to where it should be~Lamborghini.As of looks the front is pretty tight but the back could use a little work and maybe bring out the aggressive look lamborghini has been notorious for with the Countach and Diablo. But overall I'm likin the stealth, smooth look the car has goin on. The wings are alright but I'll be missing the big spoilers. The interior is definitly kickin. I don't think anything else on the selling market can hold up against this machine. ------------------
[]D [] []V[] []D IP: Logged |
FantasyCars.com Messageboard
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
